Global Under Menu
Home > BCCI Certification > Updates & Announcements

Updates & Announcements


BCCI Certification Updates (published in APC Forum, April 2019)

The BCCI® Commission on Certification and Board of Directors have approved the following additions to the BCCI Policy and Procedures Manual for Certification.  The whole manual will be posted in the coming weeks but these new additions pertain to plagiarism, professionalism and ethics.
 

Section 1. Part 1(and 2). II. Procedures for Certification….
E. All material submitted by the candidate must be original and written by the candidate.  Plagiarism of any form will not be tolerated.

  1. Plagiarism will be defined as:
  2. Submitting someone else's work as your own.
  3. Copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit.
  4. Failing to put a quotation in quotation marks.
  5. Giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation.
  6. Changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit.
  7. Copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not.
  8. Plagiarism will be subject to a review by the APC Professional Ethics Committee in consultation with the BCCI Commission on Certification. If found in violation, the candidate will be withdrawn from the certification process for at least one year.

 
Section 1. Part 1(and 2). II. Procedures for Certification….
F.  The applicant/candidate will conduct themselves in a professional and ethical manner, respecting the boundaries and personhood of any BCCI Staff, Commission Member, Area Certification Chair or Certification Committee Member. If at anytime an applicant/candidate acts in an unprofessional, unethical or threatening way, the conduct will be subject to a review by the APC Professional Ethics Committee in Consultation with the BCCI Commission on Certification.
 
Section 3. Part 1. II Procedures for Committees
W. All committee members will conduct themselves in a professional and ethical manner, respecting the boundaries and personhood of any Candidate, BCCI Staff, Commission Member, Area Certification Chair or Certification Committee Member. If at anytime a committee member acts in an unprofessional, unethical or threatening way, the conduct will be subject to a review by the APC Professional Ethics Committee in Consultation with the BCCI Commission on Certification.
 
Section 3. Part 1. II Procedures for Committees
X. If an Appeal has been upheld or if any of the Policies and Procedures for BCCI Certification Committees have been discovered to have not been followed, a review of the committee members will be conducted by the BCCI Commission on Certification. Committee members may be subject to a review by the APC Professional Ethics Committee, as described in Section 3. Part 1.II.X.


Questions or comments on any of these items can be directed to bcci@professionalchaplains.org.
 



BCCI Certification Updates (published in APC Forum, February 2018)
 

The BCCI® Commission on Certification and Area Certification Chairs have continued to be hard at work since the fall.  Area Certification chairs coordinated interviews for 122 candidates in October & November and are currently preparing for 130 candidates in February and March.  The Commission has reviewed and updated several items which have been approved by the BCCI® Board of Directors.
 
1. Theological Education Equivalency Committee Announcement of Change to Section 7 of the Education Equivalency Worksheet
 
A change has been made to the Theological Education Equivalency Worksheet. Certification applicants will find a restructured Section 7 and mentors will need to be alert to the revised approach to Work Experience and Professional Attestation. This change applies to all Theological Education Equivalency Worksheets submitted beginning August 1st.
 
Under the new Section 7, applicants will be able to earn up to 15 graduate semester hours of education credits by demonstrating workplace learning. Applicants who have earned a minimum of 10 hours through workplace learning will have the option of earning up to an additional 5 hours of credit with a well-documented Letter of Attestation from a qualified BCCI or ACPE certified chaplain.
 
Currently, applicants can earn up to 30 hours, with 15 hours accrued independently for Work Experience or Professional Attestation. The change to a maximum of 15 total hours represents a refocusing of priority toward academic learning while continuing to value the learning that takes place in the course of practicing chaplaincy. The proposal for the change was submitted to the BCCI® Commission by the Theological Education Equivalency Committee and voted into effect by the Commission and the BCCI Board of Directors.
 
 
2. Demonstrating and Evaluating ITP6: Articulate how primary research and research literature inform the profession of chaplaincy and one’s spiritual care practice
 
For ITP6, the writing guide states:  Spiritual care providers integrate research literacy and may conduct research to ensure that their spiritual care is current and innovative in their practice. Using examples, demonstrate how you are utilizing current research literature in your spiritual care practice and work with interdisciplinary team members.  If applicable, what primary research have you participated in and what were the key findings?  How are you integrating your findings in your spiritual care practice?
 
To demonstrate this competence, a candidate will—at a minimum—demonstrate with one specific example how research has impacted their practice of chaplaincy. We recognize that this is an evolving competency for many of us and the criteria for demonstrating competency in research literacy will grow over time.  For now we encourage candidates to give examples of a research study or article or book they have read and give a clear example of how that research has informed their care.  Questions committees might ask are: Has the candidate used any research in their work as a chaplain?  Has any finding prompted the candidate to start, stop, change, or continue any particular part of their chaplaincy work?   
 
The answer could be something like, “Research shows that patients and families perceive care givers to be more attentive and spend more time with them when the care giver is seated rather than standing. So, whenever possible and appropriate, I ask the patient/family for permission to sit with them (rather than standing over them),” or “I’m aware of a study about chaplaincy visits being associated with higher patient-satisfaction scores, which I told my VP about as I was advocating for more chaplains to be hired,” or “I heard about a study of spiritual-care communication boards for non-vocal ICU patients, and I got the board and use it now when I make visits in the ICU.” None of those is a sophisticated answer, but they illustrate where the acceptable minimum is. Unacceptable would be just a generic “I believe in research” statement without reference to any specific finding or even general findings, and without a clear example of how they have demonstrated this within their work. 
 
3. Buddhist Task Force Work
 
Last year, a task force was formed with representatives from the BCCI® Commission on Certification, representatives from Buddhist studies programs and centers, and several Buddhist chaplains.  The first task the group worked on was reviewing the Faith Group Recognition form and determining new language and requirements which would be understood by Buddhist sanghas and communities.  This form is completed and can be found HERE.
 
The task force will now begin reviewing the 2006 Buddhist White Paper which delineates the method for Buddhists to receive a theological education equivalency. 
 
4. Research Hours Count for Work Experience Hours
 
At the request of a provisionally board certified chaplain and a board certified chaplain candidate, the commission considered the request to allow profession-related research to be counted as work experience.  The Commission and Board of Directors approved this request, with the following criteria:  Profession-related research is defined as participating in a profession-related research study as a principal investigator, co-investigator, collaborator, research assistant, project coordinator or consultant (including design, literature search/evaluation, intervention, data analysis, writing/revising manuscript or poster). 
 
Questions or comments on any of these items can be directed to bcci@professionalchaplains.org.